Existence of Photons

A Hubble Experiment to Confirm the Existence of Individual Photons

I hope to encourage NASA and/or observational astronomers to proceed with a simple experiment, which seems ideally suited for the Hubble telescope. Very large telescopes like the Hubble are capable of seeing extremely faint stars. The amount of light we receive from such stars is so small that "time exposure" photographs are the only method of accumulating an image of them. Light is collected for hours, to capture enough to form a tiny point image. All Physicists know that this light arrives as discrete photons and not as a continuous supply of light energy.

Public Service
Categories

Becoming Self-Sufficient

Environmental Subjects

Scientific Subjects

Advanced Physics

Social Subjects

Religious Subjects

Public Services Home Page

Main Menu

E-mail

The reasoning here is that WHILE collecting the light for such a long exposure of a very faint star, many individual photons would be captured AND there should also be intervals where no photons are collected. A normal time-exposure would never be aware of this, because all that is desired is the collected total of light over the whole exposure period. What is suggested here is to piggy-back on to a standard observation, a second experiment. A standard counter circuit could be used to count how many photons arrived in, say 1/20 second intervals. It will be suggested below that a source with magnitude +24 should be providing photons at around 4 per second (for a telescope with a mirror of one square meter area). If twenty "polls" were made during that second, of the electronic output of a pixel of the detector array, it should be that four of the polls would usually show one reception and the remainder would show zero. In principle, each pixel element of the detector array could be polled in this way. A simple sequential display of those polling results should demonstrate the discrete nature of the photon reception in this way. This would confirm again the reality of the particle nature of light.

Text Font Face

Text Size

Background

Color

(for printing)

At the Earth's distance from the Sun, we receive solar energy at about 1350 watts per square meter of area. This can also be described as 1350 Joules per second per square meter or 1.35 * 10¹⁰ ergs per second per square meter. This amount of energy reception is for the Sun, which is at a Visual Magnitude of -26.

The energy carried by an individual photon is given by the product of Planck's constant and the frequency of the radiation. Planck's constant is about 6.6 * 10^-27 erg-seconds. Sunlight is made up of a spectrum of colors, and therefore wavelengths or frequencies. A central wavelength is often taken as 0.556 micron or 5560 Angstroms. Since the product of frequency and wavelength is equal to the speed of light (3 * 10⁸ meters per second), simple math gives a frequency of this light as about 5.4 * 10¹⁴ cycles per second. Multiplying this value by Planck's constant gives 3.6 * 10^-12 ergs as the energy of a single photon (of that color light).

Using the above value of Solar energy of 1.35 * 10¹⁰ ergs per second per square meter, this means that this represents about 3.8 * 10²¹ photons per second per square meter of reception area, from the Sun, which is at Visual Magnitude -26.

For each 5 Magnitudes fainter, the brightness or intensity of the radiation received is less by a factor of 100 (by definition). Thus, a source of a brightness of Magnitude -21 would supply us with 1/100 as many photons, or 3.8 * 10¹⁹. Extending this analysis, a source of Magnitude +24 (well within the ability of large telescopes), would be supplying us with light at the rate of about 3.8 photons per second.

IF 3.8 photons per second are received per square meter of reception area, the Hubble's 4.5 square meters of primary mirror area would collect roughly 20 photons per second from each (+24 magnitude) star. During a very brief time interval, say 0.01 second, only about 1/5 of the actual stars should record on the exposure, due to reception of an individual photon from that star during that 0.01 second.

If an array count chart was made for each pixel of a detector array for that 0.01 second, only around 1/5 of the objects should seem to appear. During the NEXT 0.01 second, other pixels would be triggered, resulting in an extremely different pattern (during that brief poll). A series of such brief interval "polls" which essentially acts as a rapid series of exposures should then each show a random assortment of visible stars of the field. If that sequence was then viewed sequentially, all of the constituent stars would seem to blink, with each being visible about 1/5 of the time. The conventional time-exposure result would just show the standard desired appearance, showing all the stars at their appropriate brightnesses.

The existence of this result would confirm once again the quantized nature of light. A wave nature would not demonstrate any of the "blinking" described above, and each star's image would be constant. Such an experiment would also confirm the reality of Planck's constant and other basic premises of Physics.

I am not aware that anyone has ever done such an experiment. If it has been done, please inform me and accept my apologies for overlooking your efforts!

There would appear to be some additional important consequences of this effect, assuming it actually exists. The amount of energy carried by a single photon is dependent on the wavelength of the light it represents. That implies that the individual polls of Magnitude +24 (or fainter) objects will necessarily include reception of photons of various energy contents, due to the different colors of the light being received. Careful analysis of the polled results might offer some data on this. Photons of violet light should cause the detector to give an output with more amplitude than photons of red light. An analysis of the amplitudes of those individual photons should essentially give a spectrum of the object, one photon at a time!

Again, a solidly accepted portion of Physics would thereby be confirmed.

This presentation was first placed on the Internet in February 2000.

Advanced Physics-related presentations in this Domain:

Astro-Physics related Subjects:

Conservation of Angular Momentum A Violation of the Conservation of Angular Momentum Galaxy Spiral Arms Stability and Dynamics A purely Newtonian gravitational explanation (Nov 1997, Aug 1998)
Twins Paradox. The Twins Paradox of Relativity is Certainly and Obviously Wrong (research 1997-2004, published Aug 2004)
Perturbation Theory. Gravitational Theory and Resonance (Aug 2001, Dec 2001)
Origin of the Earth. Planetary Gravitational Resonances (Dec 2001)
Rotation of the Sun (Jan 2000)
Origin of the Universe. Cosmogony - Cosmology (more logical than the Big Bang) (devised 1960, internet 1998)
Time Passes Faster Here on Earth than on the Moon! (but only a fraction of a second per year!) (Jan 2009)

Globular Clusters. All Globulars Must Regularly Pass Through the cluttered Galaxy Plane, which would be very disruptive to their pristine form. (Nov 1997, Aug 1998)
Existence of Photons. A Hubble Experiment to Confirm the Existence of Individual Photons (experimental proof of quanta) (Feb 2000)
The Origin of the Moon (June 2000)
Rotation of Jupiter, Saturn, and the Earth (Jupiter has a lot of gaseous turbulence which should have slowed down its rapid rotation over billions of years) (March 1998)
Cepheid Variables Velocity Graph Analysis (Feb 2003)
Compton Effect. A Possible New Compton Effect (Mar 2003)
Olbers Paradox Regarding Neutrinos (Oct 2004)
Kepler and Newton. Calculations (2006)
Pulsars. Pulsars May Be Quite Different than we have Assumed (June 2008)
How the Sun Works in Creating Light and Heat (Aug 2006)
Fusion. Lives of Stars and You (Aug 2004)
Equation of Time. Sundial to Clock-Time Correction Factor (Jan 2009)
General Relativity. Confirming General Relativity with a simple experiment. (Jan 2009)
General Relativity. Does Time Dilation Result? (Jan 2009)
Geysers on Io. Source of Driving Energy (June 1998)
Mass Extinctions. A New Explanation For Apparent Periodicity of Mass Extinctions (May 1998, August 2001)
Precession. Gyroscope Precession and Precession of the Earth's Equinoxes (Apr 1998)
Tides. Mathematical Explanation of Tides (Jan 2002)
Source of Energy Using the Moon (1990, Dec. 2009)
Earth's Magnetic Field. Complex nature of the magnetic field and its source (March 1996)
Perfect Energy Source From the Earth's Spinning (1990, Nov. 2002)

Nuclear or Atomic Physics related Subjects:

Nuclear Structure. Statistical Analysis of Same-Atomic-Weight Isotopes (research 1996-2003, published Nov 2003)
Quantum Defect The Quantum Defect is a Physical Quantity and not a Fudge Factor(July 2007)
Atomic Ionization Data Surprising Patterns in the NIST Data Regarding Atomic Ionization (June 2007)
Nuclear Physics Logical Inconsistencies in Nuclear Physics (August 2007)
Neutrinos. Where Did All the Neutrinos Come From? (August 2004)
Neutrinos. Neutrinos from Everywhere? (Oct 2004)
Quantum Nuclear Physics. A Possible Alternative (Aug 2001, Dec 2001, Jan 2004)
Quantum Physics. A Potential Improvement (2006)
Quantum Physics is Compatible with the Standard Model
Quantum Physics is Compatible with the Standard Model (2002, Sept 2006, Oct 2010)
Quantum Dynamics (March 2008)
Ionization Potential. Surprising patterns among different elements (March 2003)

Nuclear Structure. The Mass Defect Chart (calculation, formula) (research 1996-2003, published Nov 2003)
Assorted other Physics Subjects:

Precession. Gyroscope Precession and Precession of the Earth's Equinoxes (Apr 1998)
Earth's Magnetic Field. Complex nature of the magnetic field and its source (March 1996)
Perfect Energy Source From the Earth's Spinning (1990, Nov. 2002)

Earth Energy Flow Rates due to Precessional Effects (63,000 MegaWatts) Gravitational Constant. An Important Gravitation Experiment (Feb 2004)
Tornadoes. The Physics of Tornadoes, including How they Form. Solar Energy, an Immense Source of Energy, Far Greater than all Fossil Fuels (Feb 2000, Feb 2006, May 2009)
Carbon-14. Radiometric Age Dating, Carbon-14, C-14 (Dec 1998)
Mass Extinctions. An Old Explanation For Apparent Periodicity of Mass Extinctions (Aug 2003)
Hurricanes A Credible Approach to Hurricane Reduction (Feb 2001)
Equation of Time. Sundial to Clock-Time Correction Factor (Jan 2009)

This page - - - - is at
This subject presentation was last updated on - -

Link to the Public Service Science Projects Index

http://mb-soft.com/public/othersci.html

E-mail to: Public4@mb-soft.com

C Johnson, Theoretical Physicist, Physics Degree from Univ of Chicago