The standard definition for the "biblical theology movement" has been provided by OT scholar Brevard S Childs.标准定义为“圣经神学运动”已所提供的酒店学者布里瓦德s childs 。 He perceptively describes the background, rise, flowering, and demise of the American aspect of the movement from the middle of the 1940s to the early part of the 1960s.他perceptively描述的背景,崛起,开花,和光船承租人对美国方面的运动,来自中东的1940年代初的一部分, 20世纪60年代。 In a more general sense the biblical theology movement was made up of biblical scholars in North America and Europe who shared liberal, critical assumptions and methods in an attempt to do theology in relation to biblical studies.在一个更一般意义上圣经神学运动组成的圣经学者在北美和欧洲谁共享自由,关键的假设和方法,企图做神学在有关圣经研究。 This new way of doing theology was most fundamentally concerned to do justice to the theological dimension of the Bible, which previous generations of liberal scholars had almost completely neglected.这个新的处事方法,神学是最根本的关注,以讨回公道的神学方面的圣经,前几代的自由学者们几乎完全忽略了。 Accordingly the movement reflected an interest of European neo - orthodox theologians of the 1920s and beyond.因此,运动反映了欧洲的利益,新保守主义-东正教神学家对1 920年及以后。
Neo - orthodoxy and the biblical theology movement shared the common concern to understand the Bible as a fully human book to be investigated with the fully immanent historical - critical method and yet to see the Bible as a vehicle or witness of the divine Word.新保守主义-正统和圣经神学运动一样,共同关心,了解圣经,作为一个完全由人类书,进行调查与充分的内在历史-关键的方法和还没有看到圣经作为一种工具或证人的神圣诺言。 This meant a meshing of the modern naturalistic - evolutionary world view as developed by natural science, modern philosophy, and critical history with the biblical view of a God who gives meaning and coherence to this world in his personal acts in history.这意味着啮合的现代自然-进化的世界观,作为开发的自然科学,现代哲学,和关键的历史与圣经的看法是上帝谁给的意义和连贯性,这个世界在他的个人行为,在历史上。
| BELIEVE 相信 Religious 宗教 Information 信息 Source 来源 web-site 网址: |
| Our List of 1,000 Religious Subjects 我们所列出的1000名宗教科目 |
| E-mail 电子邮箱 |
Joined to this was the axiom that Israel borrowed extensively from the surrounding pagan cultures and religions and that Israelite and NT faith is best understood from the point of view of natural theology.加入到这是公理,以色列借来的广泛,从周围的异教文化和宗教,以及以色列人和NT的信仰是最好的了解,从的角度来看,自然神学。 All of this meant a lack of concern regarding the theological interests of the Bible for church, community, and individual.所有这一切都意味着缺乏关注,关于神学的利益圣经教会,社区和个人。 This sterile liberal theology, devoid of meaning for church and life, remained incompatible to significant segments of Christianity, particularly American Protestantism, which had only reluctantly given in to the historical - critical method in the long and devastating fundamentalist - modernist controversy.这不育,自由神学,毫无意义,教会和生活,仍然是不相容的显着部分的基督教,特别是美国基督教,只勉强给在向历史-批评方法在长期的和毁灭性的原教旨主义-现代主义的争议。 The biblical theology movement directed its efforts against the extremes of the historical - critical approach to the Bible, while itself remaining faithful to the historical - critical method, its presuppositions, and its procedures.圣经神学运动的指示,努力消除极端的历史-关键的方法来圣经,而本身余下的忠实于历史-批评方法,其预设的,其程序。 The attempt of the movement was to move beyond the older liberal position within the liberal framework of the study of the Bible.企图运动是要超越前辈,自由的地位,自由的框架内,研究圣经。
It must be noted, however, that neo - orthodoxy was not a return to older Protestant orthodoxy, which held that all Scripture was divinely inspired.必须指出,然而,新保守主义-正统,是不是返回到老年人的新教正统,认为所有的经文是神的灵感。 By and large the biblical theology movement joined the neo - orthodox view of revelation and inspiration.由和大型圣经神学运动加入新保守主义-东正教的看法启示和灵感。 Revelation is essentially God revealing himself in Christ, and Scripture may become a witness to this revelation.启示基本上是上帝透露自己在基督里,和经文,有可能成为见证这个启示。 The Bible is not the word of God but may become the word of God in its witness to Christ.圣经是不是上帝的话,但有可能成为天主的圣言在其见证基督。 Particularly useful to the movement was Brunner's view on revelation in which he attacked classical Protestant and American fundamentalists on the one hand and classical liberals on the other.特别是有益的运动是布鲁勒尔的看法,启示他在其中攻击古典新教和原教旨主义对美国一方面与古典自由派对其他。 The biblical theology movement could join ranks with the neo - orthodox theology to wage a common battle against both liberalism in theology and fundamentalism among conservative segments in America.圣经神学运动可以加入队伍与新保守主义-东正教神学工资一个共同对抗双方自由主义在神学和原教旨主义之间的保守阶层在美国。
The contrast between Greek and Hebrew thought (T Boman and others) became rather important.对比希腊和希伯来语的思考(吨boman等) ,成为相当重要的。 Although the NT was written in Greek, the Hebrew mentality was common to both testaments.虽然新台币写在希腊文,希伯来文的心态,是双方共同的testaments 。 The idea of the Hebrew mentality led to significant studies of words in both testaments.的思想,希伯来文的心态,导致了重大的研究换言之,在双方testaments 。 The outlines of the Hebraic thought patterns were reflected in the words of the Hebrew language, and this Hebraic thought content was also communicated through the vehicle of language (Greek) of the NT.纲要的hebraic思维模式反映在了的话,希伯来文的语言,这hebraic思想内容,也是沟通,通过车辆的语文(希腊文)的新台币。
The corresponding emphasis on history meant that the revelational encounter in history provided the bridge of the gap between past and present in that Israel's history became the church's history and subsequently our modern history.相应的重点是对历史的意思是revelational中遇到的历史提供了桥之间的差距,过去和目前在以色列的历史,成为教会的历史和后来我们的近代历史。 In the church's liturgy the believer and the community of faith participate in the same redemptive event by means of recital.在教会的礼仪信仰和社会的信仰一样,参与的救赎事件的方式演奏。
There is no easy way of evaluating and assessing the biblical theology movement because it is part of a trend in modern liberal theology and in part an overlapping with the neo - orthodox movement in our century.有没有简便的方法的评价和评估圣经神学运动,因为它是一个组成部分的趋势,在现代自由神学和在部分重叠,与新保守主义-东正教运动在我们的世纪。 The following features may serve as major points of issue that are called for in an assessment of the movement:以下特点可作为重点的问题是要求在评估运动:
While the movement was critical of its forefathers in the liberal tradition of theology on a number of points as noted above, in a major sense the members of the biblical theology movement continued the liberal tradition.而运动是至关重要的,其祖先在自由的传统神学上的一些要点如上所述,在一个重大意义的成员圣经神学运动继续自由的传统。 The secular - scientific (and liberal) understanding of the origin and development of the world along the evolutionary Darwinian model was accepted as axiomatic, and the liberal understanding of the movement of history along general historicist lines was not radically questioned.世俗-科学(自由)的认识的起源和发展的世界沿着进化达尔文模型被接纳为不言自明的,和自由的认识运动的历史,随着历史主义的一般电话线并未发生根本性的质疑。 Onto the contemporary scientific understanding of the movement of history along general historicist lines was not radically questioned.进入当代科学的认识运动的历史,随着历史主义的一般电话线并未发生根本性的质疑。 Onto the contemporary scientific understanding of both nature and history theologians of the biblical theology movement attempted to graft the biblical understanding of God as Creator and Lord who is dynamically active in the process of history (GE Wright).进入当代科学的了解,双方的性质和历史神学的圣经神学运动,试图移植圣经的认识,上帝的创造者和主谁是动态活跃在历史的进程(葛赖特) 。
This meshing of a "secular" or "atheistic" (A Schlatter) historical - critical method and a naturalistic - evolutionary world view with the God of the Bible who gives meaning and coherence to this world in his personal acts in history was "at best only an uneasy dualism" (Gilkey, 91).这啮合一个“世俗”或“无神论” ( 1 schlatter )的历史-关键的方法和自然-进化的世界观与上帝的圣经谁给的意义和连贯性,这个世界在他的个人行为,在历史上是“在最佳不仅是一个不安的二元论“ ( gilkey , 91 ) 。 Childs notes incisively that "the historical - critical method is an inadequate method of studying the Bible as the Scriptures of the church," setting up "an iron curtain between the past and the present" (Chils, 141 - 42). childs注意到,精辟地指出: “历史-关键的方法是不够的方法研究圣经,因为圣经的教会” ,设立“铁幕之间的过去和现在” ( c hils, 1 41- 42 )。
The Issue of "What It Meant" and "What It Means." The biblical theology movement attempted to put aside the dichotomy between the past and the present, the historical - critical and theological study of the Bible, or the descriptive and the normative approach to the Bible. 问题“是什么意思”和“是什么意思” 。圣经神学运动,企图放下对立过去和现在,历史-关键和神学研究圣经,或描述性和规范性的做法以圣经。 The interest in the theological dimension of the Bible was of major concern.利益在神学方面的圣经是关注的主要问题。 Nevertheless, the distinction of "what it meant" as that which is descriptive, objective, and scientific as compared to "what it means" as that which is theological and normative (see K Stendahl) put a wedge between what the movement attempted to overcome.然而,区分“是什么意思” ,因为这是描述性的,客观的,科学的作为相比, “是什么意思” ,因为这是神学和规范(见k stendahl )付诸表决,离间什么运动,企图克服。 While Stendahl's distinction of "what it meant" and "what it means" remains highly debated (see Hasel, OT Theology, 35 - 75), it struck a blow at the heart of the movement.而stendahl的区别“是什么意思”和“是什么意思”仍然是高度的辩论(见哈塞尔,职能治疗神学, 35 -7 5) ,它是一个打击的心脏运动。
The concept of revelation in history as an alternative to propositional revelation on the one hand or general revelation on the other did not prove successful.概念的启示在历史上作为一种替代,以命题的启示,一方面或一般的启示对其他没有证明是成功的。 The more recent attempt to replace revelation in history with the view that the OT is "story rather than history" (Barr) does not overcome the ambiguities of history but merely replaces them with those connected with story.较近期的企图,以取代的启示在历史上同认为,酒店是“的故事,而非历史” (巴尔)不克服含糊不清的历史,而只是取代了他们与那些与故事。 Biblical revelation carries within itself its own validation by enabling the recipient of revelation to grasp the content of revelation and to be grasped by the truth of revelation.圣经的启示进行本身自己的验证,使收件人的启示把握的内容,启示和被所掌握的真理的启示。 Due to the fact that biblical revelation is self - authenticating, there can be no external proofs that stand as judges over the revelation of the Bible.由于这一事实,即圣经的启示是不言而喻的-验证,不能有任何的外部证据证明的立场,作为法官的启示圣经。
In short, the biblical theology movement was a major attempt for a full generation in the twentieth century to correct liberal theology from within itself.在短期内,圣经神学运动是一项重大尝试了整整一代在20世纪,以正确的自由神学,从内部本身。 It did not succeed because it ultimately remained a captive of the basic modes, thought patterns, presuppositions, and methods of liberal theology itself.它没有得逞,因为它最终仍是一个俘虏的基本模式,思维模式,假定和方法,自由神学本身。 It provided, therefore, an additional impetus to more recent attempts that show the basic method of liberalism, ie, the historical - critical method, as bankrupt (W Wink) or announce its end (G Maier) and seek for new methods of the study of the Bible and its theology whether it be a theological - historical method (GF Hasel) or structuralism (D Patte).它提供,因此,额外的动力,以较近期的企图,显示的基本方法,自由主义,即历史-批评方法,作为破产(瓦特,纵容)或宣布其结束(克梅尔) ,并寻求新的研究方法对圣经和它的神学,无论是神学-历史的方法(绿,哈塞尔)或结构(四p atte) 。
GF
Hasel绿哈塞尔
(Elwell Evangelical Dictionary)
( elwell福音事工促进会,字典)
Bibliography
参考书目
DL Baker, Two
Testaments: One Bible; J Barr, IDB Supplement; BS Childs, Biblical Theology in
Crisis; L Gilkey, Naming the Whirlwind and "Cosmology, Ontology, and the Travail
of Biblical Language," Jr. 41; GF Hasel, NT Theology: Basic Issues in the
Current Debate and OT Theology: Basic Issues in the Current Debate; G Maier, The
End of the Historical - Critical Method; JD Smart, The Past, Present, and Future
of Biblical Theology; D Patte, What Is Structuralism? dl贝克,两个testaments :
1圣经; j巴尔,美洲开发银行补充;学士childs ,圣经神学在危机中;升gilkey ,命名旋风“的宇宙观,本体论,和travail圣经的语言, ”小41
;绿,哈塞尔,新台币神学:基本问题,在目前的辩论和酒店神学:基本问题,在目前的辩论;克梅尔,年底的历史-批评方法;第纳尔聪明,过去,现在和未来的圣经神学; d
p atte,什么是结构? K Stendahl, IDB,
I; W Wink, The Bible in Human Transformation: Toward a New Paradigm for Bible
Study. k stendahl ,美洲开发银行,我;瓦特,纵容,圣经在人类转型:迈向新的范式的圣经研究。
This subject presentation in the original English language这个课题介绍,在原有的英语语言
Send an e-mail question or comment to us: E-mail邮件发送问题或意见给我们: 电子邮箱
The main BELIEVE web-page (and the index to subjects) is at http://mb-soft.com/believe/beliecha.html主要相信网页(和索引科目) ,是在http://mb-soft.com/believe/beliecha.html